>> >> A week ago, I had also tried using two instances of ZynAddSubFx, but it >> behaved "twitchy". Even though the CPU load was low, the sound was erratic. >> I adjusted parameters in JACK server but did not help. > > I don't see how that's possible. The two instances shouldn't be able to > interfere with each other. > It's an older laptop, but I'll go back an try again. >> >> This morning I thought it might be useful to create a new Strip Module for >> Non-mixer. Based upon your other modules, I have module that can be >> inserted into a strip signal chain that allows the user to select which MIDI >> channel to emit messages to. The idea would be that each module would have >> a series of OSC controls that would then emit MIDI messages on what ever >> channel and MIDI CC is desired. I have to learn how to teach the journal >> to create instances of this module (persistance) and it doesn't appear the >> existing frame work supports creating JACK MIDI output ports. In essence, >> it guess this module would remove the need to have something like jm2cv in >> the workflow. Would you be interested in incorporating a module like this? > > Not really, that sounds overcomplicated. It would be easier just to add a > MIDI output mode to the Control Sequence in Non Timeline. That's been on my > TODO list for a long time--it's not that it's difficult--just that it > requires a little GUI to set the channel/CC number. Isn't that what you > really wanted in the first place? I'd happily accept a patch for that. > >
I take a crack at that. I was thinking that it would be a good idea to be able to control through the mixer, but I can see that doing it in the timeline would work. One thing I was thinking was one could use the persistence in the mixer settings to persist settings in plugins that weren't managed by NSM.... Best regards, Gerry
