[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13476990#comment-13476990
 ] 

Keith Turner commented on ACCUMULO-803:
---------------------------------------

looks good a few comments.

   * can you make this patch against trunk/1.5 instead of 1.4?  I do not think 
this is something we would want to add to 1.4.
   * the user manual would need some mention of this new feature, in 
docs/src/user_manual/chapters/table_configuration.tex I think
   * in MockTable I think you should subtract from Long.MAX_VALUE instead of 
Integer.MAX_VALUE for consistency, even though its an int is being subtracted
                
> Add Reverse Logical Time as a Time Type
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-803
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-803
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: tserver
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.2
>            Reporter: Drew Farris
>            Assignee: Drew Farris
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: ACCUMULO-803.patch
>
>
> In a context where we are doing aggregation/combination of multiple values 
> for a given key it may be useful to iterate over the values associated with 
> that key in the order in which the mutations were applied (FIFO), instead of 
> the FILO order that seems to occur when using {{TimeType.LOGICAL}}. 
> I encountered when implemeting a checkAndPut operation that would ensure that 
> the previous value was expected before putting a new value. In this case, if 
> the previous value was not as expected, the mutation would be ignored. 
> Perhaps it is useful in a general case?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to