[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13478075#comment-13478075
]
Keith Turner commented on ACCUMULO-803:
---------------------------------------
bq. do you think people might want to set multiple different transformations
for different column updates in the same mutation?
One more consideration. This would add another set of put methods to mutation,
which already has alot of put methods.
> Add Reverse Logical Time as a Time Type
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: ACCUMULO-803
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-803
> Project: Accumulo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: tserver
> Affects Versions: 1.5.0
> Reporter: Drew Farris
> Assignee: Drew Farris
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: ACCUMULO-803.patch, ACCUMULO-803.patch
>
>
> In a context where we are doing aggregation/combination of multiple values
> for a given key it may be useful to iterate over the values associated with
> that key in the order in which the mutations were applied (FIFO), instead of
> the FILO order that seems to occur when using {{TimeType.LOGICAL}}.
> I encountered when implemeting a checkAndPut operation that would ensure that
> the previous value was expected before putting a new value. In this case, if
> the previous value was not as expected, the mutation would be ignored.
> Perhaps it is useful in a general case?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
