[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13763270#comment-13763270
]
Keith Turner commented on ACCUMULO-1229:
----------------------------------------
Would there ever be a need for ZooKeeperInstance to only connect to the
zookeepers the user passed (and no others)? I can not think of a use case at
the moment. Want to avoid the situation where we cause problems for users when
we were just trying to help them.
Another option to consider is not changing ZooKeeperInstance at all and
providing utility methods for obtaining a complete list of zookeeper servers
from Accumulo. A problem with this option is that it does not work with
existing user code. If ZookeeperInstance itself is changed then existing code
could benefit.
> ZooKeeperInstance.getZookeepers() should return all zookeepers, not just what
> was given to the constructor
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ACCUMULO-1229
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1229
> Project: Accumulo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: client
> Reporter: John Vines
> Priority: Minor
>
> Currently the suggested Instance is ZooKeeperInstance, which requires an
> instance name and all zookeepers the client should use to be specified. The
> client could reference just one or not necessarily all of them. The API
> should be able to get all of the known zookeepers from the system, so we
> should reduce the burden on the clients for ZooKeeper instance and just have
> them list at least one to get initial contact and then update the Instance
> appropriately.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
