[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13763468#comment-13763468 ]
Keith Turner commented on ACCUMULO-1672: ---------------------------------------- This is a race condition. I added a step to the test where it list the constraints after setting them. Listing the constraints reaches out to the tserver and clear the zoo keeper cache. This seemed better than sleeping, but its still not 100% (like when there are multiple tservers and I think MAC runs 2). > org.apache.accumulo.proxy.SimpleTest failing > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: ACCUMULO-1672 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1672 > Project: Accumulo > Issue Type: Bug > Components: proxy > Environment: git commit id #21f93e3 > Ubuntu 13.04 > Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; 2013-02-19 > 08:51:28-0500) > Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.0.5 > Java version: 1.7.0_25, vendor: Oracle Corporation > Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-oracle/jre > Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8 > OS name: "linux", version: "3.8.0-26-generic", arch: "amd64", family: "unix" > Reporter: Mike Drob > Assignee: Corey J. Nolet > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 1.6.0 > > > Command executed: > {{mvn clean test -Dtest=org.apache.accumulo.proxy.* -pl proxy > -DfailIfNoTests=false -am -T1.0C}} > Output: > {noformat} > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Test set: org.apache.accumulo.proxy.SimpleTest > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 40.618 sec > <<< FAILURE! > testTableOperations(org.apache.accumulo.proxy.SimpleTest) Time elapsed: > 1.954 sec <<< ERROR! > MutationsRejectedException(msg:org.apache.accumulo.core.client.MutationsRejectedException: > # constraint violations : 1 security codes: {} # server errors 0 # > exceptions 0) > at > org.apache.accumulo.proxy.thrift.AccumuloProxy$updateAndFlush_result$updateAndFlush_resultTupleScheme.read(AccumuloProxy.java) > at > org.apache.accumulo.proxy.thrift.AccumuloProxy$updateAndFlush_result$updateAndFlush_resultTupleScheme.read(AccumuloProxy.java) > at > org.apache.accumulo.proxy.thrift.AccumuloProxy$updateAndFlush_result.read(AccumuloProxy.java) > at org.apache.thrift.TServiceClient.receiveBase(TServiceClient.java:78) > at > org.apache.accumulo.proxy.thrift.AccumuloProxy$Client.recv_updateAndFlush(AccumuloProxy.java:2414) > at > org.apache.accumulo.proxy.thrift.AccumuloProxy$Client.updateAndFlush(AccumuloProxy.java:2399) > at > org.apache.accumulo.proxy.SimpleTest.testTableOperations(SimpleTest.java:949) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) > at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) > at > org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47) > at > org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12) > at > org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44) > at > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271) > at > org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70) > at > org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229) > at > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26) > at > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:252) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:112) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) > at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:115) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:75) > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira