[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13806404#comment-13806404 ]
Mike Drob commented on ACCUMULO-1242: ------------------------------------- I know of a person working on this, I'll ping him and see what his status is. This actually has a shot at making it in to 1.6 > Consistent logging > ------------------ > > Key: ACCUMULO-1242 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1242 > Project: Accumulo > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Christopher Tubbs > Assignee: Mike Drob > Labels: log4j, logging, logs, slf4j > Fix For: 1.7.0 > > > Logging dependencies are very inconsistent. It seems we have absolute > dependencies on log4j, yet use slf4j sometimes, and log4j other times. In > some of our tests we have slf4j-nop as a test dependency. > It seems we could consolidate a lot of this if we simply did: > # slf4j-api : compile > # slf4j-log4j12 : runtime > # slf4j-nop : test > # log4j : runtime > We could do this in the parent POM and get rid of all the different > dependencies throughout the code. > I don't know that we could ever use anything other than slf4j-log4j12 as the > implementation (unless our dependencies broke away from using log4j directly > also), but at least we'd clean up all the logging dependencies in our > code/build, and would be ready to switch to something better if something > came along. Further, if somebody wanted to reuse our code, and weren't tied > to log4j, because they didn't need our transitive dependencies that locked in > log4j, they could easily depend on their own slf4j implementation jar, and > all the logging in our code would still work correctly for them without > needing to use something like log4j-over-slf4j. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1#6144)