[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14007554#comment-14007554
 ] 

Bill Havanki commented on ACCUMULO-2789:
----------------------------------------

Cut-and-paste error in {{WriteOptions.cqMax()}} - it's looking at the column 
family values, not column qualifier. This prevents running when the qualifier 
is configured to be larger than the family, among other issues.

I have some expanded scripts that make running these tests more like 
continuous. They can go into a follow-on JIRA unless someone feels strongly 
that they should go here.

> Add a system stress test based on key/cell/row size
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-2789
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2789
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: test
>            Reporter: Sean Busbey
>            Assignee: William Slacum
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.5.2, 1.6.1, 1.7.0
>
>
> Add a system test that allows stress testing an Accumulo instance in the 
> presence of large cells and rows.
> The test should run a configurable number of ingest and reading clients and 
> allow setting:
> * configurable range of overall key size
> * configurable range of key component sizes
> * configurable value size
> * configurable number of cells per row
> * optional use of isolation on server and/or client
> This kind of test would help us preemptively find issues like ACCUMULO-2671, 
> ACCUMULO-201, and the tserver memory crashes observed with some large 
> mutation sizes while working on YCSB support for Accumulo.
> It will also help us provide test examples of supporting large cardinality on 
> rowids, column families, and visibilities.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to