[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Corey J. Nolet updated ACCUMULO-2990:
-------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 1.6.2)
                   1.6.3

> BatchWriter never recovers from failure(s)
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-2990
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2990
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: client
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.1, 1.6.0
>            Reporter: Josh Elser
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 1.5.3, 1.7.0, 1.6.3
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In trying to understand what's happening in ACCUMULO-2964, I noticed that I 
> had similar exceptions from two different threads. One of the threads 
> starting working after the unexplained thrift exceptions from a tserver 
> restart, and the other continued to repeatedly fail for the lifetime of the 
> test.
> I repeatedly saw this exception: 
> {noformat}
> 2014-07-11 04:14:41,591 [replication.WorkMaker] WARN : Failed to write work 
> mutations for replication, will retry
> org.apache.accumulo.core.client.MutationsRejectedException: # constraint 
> violations : 0  security codes: 
> {accumulo.metadata(ID:!0)=[DEFAULT_SECURITY_ERROR]}  # server errors 0 # 
> exceptions 0
>         at 
> org.apache.accumulo.core.client.impl.TabletServerBatchWriter.checkForFailures(TabletServerBatchWriter.java:537)
>         at 
> org.apache.accumulo.core.client.impl.TabletServerBatchWriter.addMutation(TabletServerBatchWriter.java:249)
>         at 
> org.apache.accumulo.core.client.impl.BatchWriterImpl.addMutation(BatchWriterImpl.java:45)
>         at 
> org.apache.accumulo.master.replication.WorkMaker.addWorkRecord(WorkMaker.java:184)
>         at 
> org.apache.accumulo.master.replication.WorkMaker.run(WorkMaker.java:124)
>         at 
> org.apache.accumulo.master.replication.ReplicationDriver.run(ReplicationDriver.java:91)
> {noformat}
> The part that struck me as odd was that the BatchWriter wasn't against the 
> metadata table, but the replication table.
> I looked into the TabletServerBatchWriter. It appears that once the client 
> sees a MutationsRejectedException, that BatchWriter becomes useless as the 
> internal member {{somethingFailed}} is never reset back to {{false}} after 
> the failure is reported. Same goes for {{serverSideErrors}}, 
> {{unknownErrors}}, {{lastUnknownErrors}}, too.
> If this is the case, this is a bug because the BatchWriter should be 
> resilient in this regard and not force the client to create a new Instance. 
> If that's infeasible to do, we should add exceptions to the BatchWriter that 
> fail fast when a BatchWriter is used that will report repeatedly report the 
> same failure over and over again.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to