[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14269491#comment-14269491 ]
Corey J. Nolet edited comment on ACCUMULO-2641 at 1/8/15 4:16 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------------ As far as I can tell, the only change was the addition of the serialVersionUuid? I did just notice that I clobbered a comment in the ActiveScan class that explains it but that's going to be clobbered anyways. I've been battling with this for awhile whenever the thrift profile has run- I'm not sure if this problem was just introduced in this ticket. It's one of the reasons I created ACCUMULO-3433. Last time i ran the thrift profile, I ran into the issue where the build failed as a result of the files being regenerated. was (Author: sonixbp): As far as I can tell, the only change was the addition of the serialVersionUuid? I did just notice that I clobbered a comment in the ActiveScan class that explains it but that's going to be clobbered anyways. I've been battling with this for awhile whenever the thrift profile has run- I'm not sure if this problem was just introduced in this ticket. It's one of the reasons I created ACCUMULO-3002. Last time i ran the thrift profile, I ran into the issue where the build failed as a result of the files being regenerated. > scan id not set in org.apache.accumulo.core.client.admin.ActiveScan > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ACCUMULO-2641 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2641 > Project: Accumulo > Issue Type: Bug > Components: client > Affects Versions: 1.4.4, 1.5.1 > Reporter: Ed Coleman > Assignee: Ed Coleman > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 1.6.2, 1.7.0 > > Attachments: ACCUMULO-2641.patch > > Time Spent: 40m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Trying to profile some long running scans I tried to use the getScanid() > method on ActiveScan, but it always returned 0. > Looking at the class, it seems that the value is never set. There is a > getter but no setter and it is not set in the constructor. > Also, it seems that the scanid is not included in the thrift ActiveScan so a > fix will not be a simple as just setting scanid in the constructor. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)