[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14490679#comment-14490679
 ] 

Josh Elser edited comment on ACCUMULO-3657 at 4/11/15 1:10 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------

bq. Would also like feedback on the types I proposed adding to the API 
definition. 

+1

Looking at the sample pom, though, I had a hard time understanding what I was 
actually reading. I guess the includes/excludes are regexs? Would the analyze 
goal be tied to any lifecycle phase? Would this feel like a findbugs/checkstyle?

bq. I excluded mock from the set of public API types. I feel mock is not being 
maintained and should be deprecated to communicate that to users

After working with HBase tests, I'm soundly convinced ACCUMULO-2739 is the way 
to go (if/when someone does the lifting) to create a faster minicluster.


was (Author: elserj):
bq. Would also like feedback on the types I proposed adding to the API 
definition. 

+1

Looking at the sample pom, though, I had a hard time understanding what I was 
actually reading. I guess the includes/excludes are regexs? Would the analyze 
goal be tied to any lifecycle phase? Would this feel like a findbugs/checkstyle?

bq. I excluded mock from the set of public API types. I feel mock is not being 
maintained and should be deprecated to communicate that to users

After working with HBase tests, I'm soundly convinced ACCUMULO-2735 is the way 
to go (if/when someone does the lifting) to create a faster minicluster.

> API Specification is incomplete
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-3657
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3657
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0, 1.5.1, 1.5.2, 1.6.0, 1.6.1, 1.6.2
>            Reporter: Keith Turner
>            Assignee: Keith Turner
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 1.5.3, 1.7.0, 1.6.3
>
>         Attachments: apilyzer-1.txt, pom-1.xml
>
>
> While working on [fluo-365|https://github.com/fluo-io/fluo/issues/365] and 
> trying to create an [example Accumulo API checkstyle 
> rule|https://gist.github.com/keith-turner/ee0deafe88fa9f5bc43f] I discovered 
> that API specification in the README is incomplete.   The API specification 
> does not include the following classes (which are referenced by classes that 
> are declared to be in public API).
>  * o.a.a.core.security.ColumnVisibility (used by public methods in Mutation)
>  * o.a.a.core.security.Authorizations (used by public methods in Connector)
>  * o.a.a.core.data.ByteSequence (used by public methods in Key)
>  * o.a.a.core.data.PartialKey (used by public methods in Key)
>  * o.a.a.core.data.ColumnUpdate (used by public methods in Mutation)
> This list is not exhausitive, I did not analyze all methods in public API.  
> These are just the issue I ran into while trying to apply a checkstyle rule 
> to Fluo.
> After correcting the README and website, it would be nice to add a 
> recommended checkstyle rule to the web site.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to