[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15089786#comment-15089786
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ACCUMULO-4095:
------------------------------------------

Github user ctubbsii commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/63#issuecomment-170101045
  
    I wish I could see the files side-by-side in GitHub to review, but the file 
was moved in addition to being updated, so GitHub is confused. :(
    
    We used to have an enforcer rule in the pom to fix us to 0.9.1 explicitly, 
so if any changes were made, the build would fail with an informative error 
message. If we're going to introduce more copy/paste reliance on 0.9.3, we 
might want to consider reintroducing that enforcement/message.


> ShellServerIT#listscans failing due to null client
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-4095
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4095
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Josh Elser
>            Assignee: Josh Elser
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 1.8.0
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> {noformat}
> root@miniInstance listscans> listscans
>  TABLET SERVER        | CLIENT               | AGE      | LAST     | STATE  | 
> TYPE  | USER    | TABLE   | COLUMNS   | AUTHORIZATIONS      | TABLET    | 
> SCAN ID    | ITERATORS            | ITERATOR OPTIONS
>   hw10447.local:53868 |                 null |      9ms |      9ms |RUNNING 
> |SINGLE |    root |listscans |        [] |                     |       2<< | 
> 4790077908898785386 
> |[SlowIterator=30,org.apache.accumulo.test.functional.SlowIterator] | 
> {SlowIterator={sleepTime=500}}
> {noformat}
> Note that the client column has a value of "null". This is causing the test 
> to fail. Seems to only be happening on master.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to