[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224240#comment-15224240
]
Dave Marion commented on ACCUMULO-4177:
---------------------------------------
Right, we need to make sure that our users know well in advance when we plan to
change the minimum java runtime version so that they can plan ahead. Or, we
could switch the implementation at runtime depending on the version of the
runtime engine.
> TinyLFU-based BlockCache
> ------------------------
>
> Key: ACCUMULO-4177
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4177
> Project: Accumulo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ben Manes
>
> [LruBlockCache|https://github.com/apache/accumulo/blob/master/core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/file/blockfile/cache/LruBlockCache.java]
> appears to be based on HBase's. I currently have a patch being reviewed in
> [HBASE-15560|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15560] that replaces
> the pseudo Segmented LRU with the TinyLFU eviction policy. That should allow
> the cache to make [better
> predictions|https://github.com/ben-manes/caffeine/wiki/Efficiency] based on
> frequency and recency, such as improved scan resistance. The implementation
> uses [Caffeine|https://github.com/ben-manes/caffeine], the successor to
> Guava's cache, to provide concurrency and keep the patch small.
> Full details are in the JIRA ticket. I think it should be easy to port if
> there is interest.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
