[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15347356#comment-15347356
 ] 

Dave Marion commented on ACCUMULO-4353:
---------------------------------------

bq. there's always a concern of technical debt (in terms of complexity)

Fair enough.

bq. If this is really about trying to make rolling-restarts better.

Not sure, I think it has to do with quick unplanned restarts, but it would be 
good to clear that up. I see a rolling restart being an intentional, planned 
activity. I think (based on "failure" in the title) this is for the 
unintentional, unplanned short duration outage (e.g. losing connectivity to a 
rack for a short time) where the administrator wants to bring the failed tablet 
servers up as soon as possible. 

> Stabilize tablet assignment during transient failure
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-4353
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4353
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Shawn Walker
>            Assignee: Shawn Walker
>            Priority: Minor
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> When a tablet server dies, Accumulo attempts to reassign the tablets it was 
> hosting as quickly as possible to maintain availability.  If multiple tablet 
> servers die in quick succession, such as from a rolling restart of the 
> Accumulo cluster or a network partition, this behavior can cause a storm of 
> reassignment and rebalancing, placing significant load on the master.
> To avert such load, Accumulo should be capable of maintaining a steady tablet 
> assignment state in the face of transient tablet server loss.  Instead of 
> reassigning tablets as quickly as possible, Accumulo should be await the 
> return of a temporarily downed tablet server (for some configurable duration) 
> before assigning its tablets to other tablet servers.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to