ddanielr commented on issue #3138: URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/3138#issuecomment-1360101411
@dlmarion Thanks, I'll get a response but I suspect it hasn't been tried. I'm wondering what the likelihood is that the FATE created by the `admin stopCommand --force` command will be processed if there are a large amount of FATEs currently "IN_PROGRESS" due to the problematic node? In general, how are FATEs processed by the accumulo manager? Is it just FIFO with the max number of FATEs "IN_PROGRESS" being determined by threadpool size? Or is there a concept of higher-priority FATEs for "system actions"? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
