[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominic Garguilo resolved ACCUMULO-1836.
----------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Closing as superseded by https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1056
> mutation could take key-value pairs in put() to be more efficient
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ACCUMULO-1836
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1836
> Project: Accumulo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Chris McCubbin
> Priority: Minor
>
> Right now, if I have a key-value pair and I want to make an insert out of it,
> I have to do something like this:
> {code}
> m.put(key.getColumnFamily(), key.getColumnQualifier(), new
> ColumnVisibility(key.getColumnVisibility()), value);
> {code}
> However, I believe this results in the data in the key being array copied
> twice which is pretty inefficient (profiling shows this to be a fairly
> significant portion of our running time on heavy ingest). Since I think
> exposing the byte arrays directly is not preferred, perhaps there could be a
> method Mutation.put(Key,Value) that efficiently re-uses the byte arrays.
> Maybe it assumes the rows are the same, or maybe it could have an option for
> checking that.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
