EdColeman commented on code in PR #3982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/3982#discussion_r1406213200


##########
core/src/test/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/data/NamespaceIdTest.java:
##########
@@ -37,22 +39,17 @@ public class NamespaceIdTest extends WithTestNames {
 
   private static final Logger LOG = 
LoggerFactory.getLogger(NamespaceIdTest.class);
 
-  private static long cacheCount() {
-    // guava cache size() is approximate, and can include garbage-collected 
entries
-    // so we iterate to get the actual cache size
-    return NamespaceId.cache.asMap().entrySet().stream().count();
-  }
-
   @Test
   public void testCacheNoDuplicates() {
     // the next line just preloads the built-ins, since they now exist in a 
separate class from
     // NamespaceId, and aren't preloaded when the NamespaceId class is 
referenced
     assertNotSame(Namespace.ACCUMULO.id(), Namespace.DEFAULT.id());
 
     String namespaceString = "namespace-" + testName();
-    long initialSize = cacheCount();
+    long initialSize = cacheCount(NamespaceId.cache);
     NamespaceId nsId = NamespaceId.of(namespaceString);
-    assertEquals(initialSize + 1, cacheCount());
+    assertCacheCountEquals(initialSize + 1, NamespaceId.cache);

Review Comment:
   The one issue with using Wait.waitFor() is that it currently is in the test 
module.  Adding the test module causes a circular dependency error - so 
Wait.waitFor would need to be relocated somewhere common.  The Wait.waitFor 
does not have junit / test dependencies, so relocating it to core should not be 
an issue.  Was just not sure we wanted to do that.
   
   



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to