cshannon commented on issue #4529: URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/4529#issuecomment-2100651508
I added the new FATE table in elasticity so I could work on this (it looks like targeting 3.1 ?) One thing is it looks like #4528 is still going to allow eventual scans by a system user so now sure how that impacts moving these refs to their own table. Others can comment too but I don't think we need/want a general utility table. To me it seems like we already have a utility table...it's the metadata table. Anything that has a low amount of writes/contention can just be stored as metadata. The purpose of this new table is specifically there's too much contention on scan file refs so it makes sense that it's put into its own table and it can be split to optimize scan refs. Same for keeping FATE separate in elasticity, I think it should be its own table to handle the volume of FATE ops that will be happening. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@accumulo.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
