ctubbsii commented on code in PR #5398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/5398#discussion_r1990462662


##########
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/rpc/AccumuloProtocolFactory.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *   https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.accumulo.core.rpc;
+
+import org.apache.accumulo.core.trace.TraceUtil;
+import org.apache.thrift.TException;
+import org.apache.thrift.protocol.TCompactProtocol;
+import org.apache.thrift.protocol.TMessage;
+import org.apache.thrift.protocol.TProtocol;
+import org.apache.thrift.transport.TTransport;
+
+import io.opentelemetry.api.trace.Span;
+import io.opentelemetry.context.Scope;
+
+public class AccumuloProtocolFactory extends TCompactProtocol.Factory {
+
+  private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
+
+  private final boolean isClient;
+
+  public static class AccumuloProtocol extends TCompactProtocol {
+
+    private static final int MAGIC_NUMBER = 0x41434355; // "ACCU" in ASCII
+    private static final byte PROTOCOL_VERSION = 1;

Review Comment:
   I was wondering about that... whether the protocol version should be 
independent, so we can version the serialization format of the protocol header.
   
   We will probably want to include the `AccumuloDataVersion.CURRENT_VERSION` 
in the protocol header directly, though. We could also include the actual 
Accumulo release version in here, too (major.minor.patch; e.g. 4.0.0). I think 
to verify, we'd probably want to ensure the same major and same minor version, 
if we want to be even more restrictive than the data version. We really 
shouldn't have Accumulo servers or clients/servers talking across major.minor 
versions (different patch releases are okay, and is important for rolling 
upgrades).
   



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to