https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52188
--- Comment #3 from Stefan Bodewig <[email protected]> 2011-11-17 11:17:18 UTC --- Your patch synchronizes access to the default excludes - which may be a good thing to do in any case - which implies the tasks you are running in parallel are modifying the default excludes. How can you ensure consistent results? About your patch, I probably wouldn't make defaultExcludes volatile but rather final (and rewrite the reset method to clear the set rather than create a new one) - in particular since you are synchronizing on it. Did you really have to make isExcluded and isSelected synchronized? These instance methods shouldn't be used by multiple threads in your parallel scenario at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
