[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Algassimou Diallo updated IVY-1617:
-----------------------------------
Description:
Hi all,
I have the following repository
{noformat}
+---------------+ conf1<-conf3 +---------------+
| org#module3;2 | <-------------- | org#module1;1 | -+
+---------------+ +---------------+ |
| | |
| | conf3->conf1 | conf2->conf2
| v |
| +---------------+ |
| +------------- | org#module2;1 | <+
| | +---------------+
| | |
| | conf1->conf1 | conf2->conf2
| | v
| | +---------------+
| +------------> | org#module3;1 |
| +---------------+
| |
| | conf2->conf2
| v
| conf2->conf2 +---------------+
+-----------------------------> | org#module4;1 |
+---------------+
{noformat}
I do a resolve on org#module1 in three different cases and for each case I
think I should not found the org#module4 in the dependencies of the conf3
configuration report:
1- with only the conf3, I don't find it
2- with conf3 and conf2 in this order, I don't find it
3- with conf2 and conf3 in this order, the org#module4 is present.
The resolve process is dependent on the order I specify the confs to resolve.
Is that the correct behavior?
You'll find attached the repository and a Junit test which expose this behavior.
Best Regards
was:
Hi all,
I have the following repository
{noformat}
+---------------+ conf1<-conf3 +---------------+
| org#module3;2 | <-------------- | org#module1;1 | -+
+---------------+ +---------------+ |
| | |
| | conf3->conf1 | conf2->conf2
| v |
| +---------------+ |
| +------------- | org#module2;1 | <+
| | +---------------+
| | |
| | conf1->conf1 | conf2->conf2
| | v
| | +---------------+
| +------------> | org#module3;1 |
| +---------------+
| |
| | conf2->conf2
| v
| conf2->conf2 +---------------+
+-----------------------------> | org#module4;1 |
+---------------+
{noformat}
I do a resolve on org#module1 in three different cases and for each case I
think I should not found the org#module4 in the dependencies of the conf3
configuration report:
1- with only the conf3 it is this case
2- with conf3 and conf2 in this order it is the case
3- with conf2 and conf3 in this order it is not the case
The resolve process is dependent on the order I specify the confs to resolve.
Is that the correct behavior?
You'll find attached the repository and a Junit test which expose this behavior.
Best Regards
> Resolve and confs order
> -----------------------
>
> Key: IVY-1617
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1617
> Project: Ivy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.5.0
> Reporter: Algassimou Diallo
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: IVY-Confs.zip, TestConfs.java
>
>
> Hi all,
> I have the following repository
>
> {noformat}
> +---------------+ conf1<-conf3 +---------------+
> | org#module3;2 | <-------------- | org#module1;1 | -+
> +---------------+ +---------------+ |
> | | |
> | | conf3->conf1 | conf2->conf2
> | v |
> | +---------------+ |
> | +------------- | org#module2;1 | <+
> | | +---------------+
> | | |
> | | conf1->conf1 | conf2->conf2
> | | v
> | | +---------------+
> | +------------> | org#module3;1 |
> | +---------------+
> | |
> | | conf2->conf2
> | v
> | conf2->conf2 +---------------+
> +-----------------------------> | org#module4;1 |
> +---------------+
> {noformat}
> I do a resolve on org#module1 in three different cases and for each case I
> think I should not found the org#module4 in the dependencies of the conf3
> configuration report:
> 1- with only the conf3, I don't find it
> 2- with conf3 and conf2 in this order, I don't find it
> 3- with conf2 and conf3 in this order, the org#module4 is present.
> The resolve process is dependent on the order I specify the confs to resolve.
> Is that the correct behavior?
> You'll find attached the repository and a Junit test which expose this
> behavior.
> Best Regards
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
