https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69684
--- Comment #2 from Jaikiran Pai <[email protected]> --- Hello Daniel, it was intentional the way it was implemented (I don't remember the exact details though, it's been a while). I think the current implementation can be enhanced if needed, but it would be good to have a few more details before that. Can you or Björn provide some more details about what kind of parallel execution you would like to see (some pseudocode of the build.xml with the junitlauncher task would help)? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
