chengzhycn opened a new issue, #12664: URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/12664
### Description Hi, all. I encountered a case where two nodes with the same ip:port were added to a upstream, and I need to load balance them. However, when I reviewed balancer.lua, I noticed that the balancer uses the ip:port as the key to construct the up_nodes. Consequently, the latter node overrides the previous node even though these nodes have different domain names. Is this a bug or a considered design？What is the consideration behind this? https://github.com/apache/apisix/blob/master/apisix/balancer.lua#L111 https://github.com/apache/apisix/blob/master/apisix/balancer.lua#L59 Thanks! ### Environment - APISIX version (run `apisix version`): - Operating system (run `uname -a`): - OpenResty / Nginx version (run `openresty -V` or `nginx -V`): - etcd version, if relevant (run `curl http://127.0.0.1:9090/v1/server_info`): - APISIX Dashboard version, if relevant: - Plugin runner version, for issues related to plugin runners: - LuaRocks version, for installation issues (run `luarocks --version`): -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
