Wenhai Li has posted comments on this change. Change subject: ASTERIX-1487: fix the wrong plan for inverted fuzzyjoin. ......................................................................
Patch Set 8: @Chen It's a quite strange query, the high-level comments towards the example is like: 1. We setup a fuzzy join over A.a ~= B.b based on a word index over A.a 2. We want to aggregate on B's fields. If we switch the consequence of A and B in the two "FOR" lines, we get inconsistent result. The RemoveUnusedOneToOneEuquiJoinRule remove the branch of A after "pseudo" broadcase B to A for enabling "SELECT" instead of fuzzy join. But that is wrong. -- To view, visit https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/1119 To unsubscribe, visit https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/settings Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: I1aef69a2278853fd9f8020da6639331b367ed5ad Gerrit-PatchSet: 8 Gerrit-Project: asterixdb Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: Wenhai Li <lwhaym...@yahoo.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Chen Li <che...@gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins <jenk...@fulliautomatix.ics.uci.edu> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jianfeng Jia <jianfeng....@gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Taewoo Kim <wangs...@yahoo.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Wenhai Li <lwhaym...@yahoo.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Yingyi Bu <buyin...@gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Yingyi Bu <ying...@google.com> Gerrit-HasComments: No
