Dmitry Lychagin has posted comments on this change. ( https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/3387 )
Change subject: [ASTERIXDB-2555][RT][COMP] Make hash join use logical comparison ...................................................................... Patch Set 2: (3 comments) https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/3387/2/asterixdb/asterix-app/src/test/resources/runtimets/results/join/hash_join_record/hash_join_record.03.adm File asterixdb/asterix-app/src/test/resources/runtimets/results/join/hash_join_record/hash_join_record.03.adm: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/3387/2/asterixdb/asterix-app/src/test/resources/runtimets/results/join/hash_join_record/hash_join_record.03.adm@a16 PS2, Line 16: why these records no longer join? "address" values seem to be the same on both sides https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/3387/2/hyracks-fullstack/algebricks/algebricks-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/hyracks/algebricks/runtime/evaluators/TuplePairEvaluatorFactory.java File hyracks-fullstack/algebricks/algebricks-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/hyracks/algebricks/runtime/evaluators/TuplePairEvaluatorFactory.java: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/3387/2/hyracks-fullstack/algebricks/algebricks-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/hyracks/algebricks/runtime/evaluators/TuplePairEvaluatorFactory.java@52 PS2, Line 52: synchronized > not sure why the old code needed this to be synchronized. agreed, I think synchronization is not required here https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/3387/2/hyracks-fullstack/hyracks/hyracks-dataflow-std/src/main/java/org/apache/hyracks/dataflow/std/util/JoinUtil.java File hyracks-fullstack/hyracks/hyracks-dataflow-std/src/main/java/org/apache/hyracks/dataflow/std/util/JoinUtil.java: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/3387/2/hyracks-fullstack/hyracks/hyracks-dataflow-std/src/main/java/org/apache/hyracks/dataflow/std/util/JoinUtil.java@36 PS2, Line 36: public String printPartitionInfo(BitSet spilledStatus, OptimizedHybridHashJoin.SIDE whichSide, int numOfPartitions, This method is specific to OptimizedHybridHashJoin, so why did we move into a generic "dataflow.std.util" package? Why not leave it where it was? -- To view, visit https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/3387 To unsubscribe, visit https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/settings Gerrit-Project: asterixdb Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: If1834967fdd913fdc76003f09636b2450d07cd5e Gerrit-Change-Number: 3387 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: Ali Alsuliman <[email protected]> Gerrit-Reviewer: Ali Alsuliman <[email protected]> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anon. E. Moose (1000171) Gerrit-Reviewer: Dmitry Lychagin <[email protected]> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins <[email protected]> Gerrit-Reviewer: Michael Blow <[email protected]> Gerrit-Reviewer: Till Westmann <[email protected]> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 17:59:42 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
