>From <preetham.polupar...@couchbase.com>: preetham.polupar...@couchbase.com has posted comments on this change. ( https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/asterixdb/+/18209 )
Change subject: [ASTERIXDB-3392] Add parquet format for COPY TO ...................................................................... Patch Set 32: (1 comment) File asterixdb/asterix-app/src/test/resources/runtimets/queries_sqlpp/copy-to/parquet-cover-data-types/parquet-cover-data-types.03.update.sqlpp: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/asterixdb/+/18209/comment/03e6e8ed_747a94e2 PS32, Line 41: int64 > Not for this patch, but do we also want to support the INT96 timestamp type? I think int96 is not recommended, We can use INTERVAL logical type with primitive type FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY(12). https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/blob/master/LogicalTypes.md#interval -- To view, visit https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/asterixdb/+/18209 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/settings Gerrit-Project: asterixdb Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I40dc16969e66af09cde04b460f441af666b39d51 Gerrit-Change-Number: 18209 Gerrit-PatchSet: 32 Gerrit-Owner: preetham.polupar...@couchbase.com Gerrit-Reviewer: Anon. E. Moose #1000171 Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins <jenk...@fulliautomatix.ics.uci.edu> Gerrit-Reviewer: Wail Alkowaileet <wael....@gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: preetham.polupar...@couchbase.com Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 09 May 2024 18:17:35 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: Wail Alkowaileet <wael....@gmail.com> Gerrit-MessageType: comment
