Github user kxepal commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fabric/pull/61#discussion_r70131900
  
    --- Diff: src/fabric_group_info.erl ---
    @@ -58,17 +58,23 @@ handle_message({rexi_EXIT, Reason}, Shard, {Counters, 
Acc, Ushards}) ->
         end;
     
     handle_message({ok, Info}, Shard, {Counters0, Acc, Ushards}) ->
    -    NewAcc = append_result(Info, Shard, Acc, Ushards),
    -    Counters1 = fabric_dict:store(Shard, ok, Counters0),
    -    Counters = fabric_view:remove_overlapping_shards(Shard, Counters1),
    -    case is_complete(Counters) of
    -    false ->
    -        {ok, {Counters, NewAcc, Ushards}};
    -    true ->
    -        Pending = aggregate_pending(NewAcc),
    -        Infos = get_infos(NewAcc),
    -        Results = [{updates_pending, {Pending}} | merge_results(Infos)],
    -        {stop, Results}
    +    case fabric_dict:lookup_element(Shard, Counters0) of
    +    undefined ->
    +        % already heard from other node in this range
    --- End diff --
    
    Something wrong here. 
[fabric_dict:lookup_element](https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fabric/blob/master/src/fabric_dict.erl#L42)
 is based on 
[couch_util:get_value](https://github.com/apache/couchdb-couch/blob/master/src/couch_util.erl#L167-L176)
 which return `undefined` in case when key is not found by default. Here it 
seems happens the opposite. And the `nil` below confuses more.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to