[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15455101#comment-15455101 ]
Robert Newson commented on COUCHDB-2980: ---------------------------------------- I'll look again but making "local" names work correctly depending on whether they are initiating from the cluster port or private port or clustered _replicator db or node-local _replicator db is a tall order, especially at the last minute. That the _replicator database itself can be replicated is an especially ugly consequence of this regrettable api. > Replicator DB on 15984 replicates to backdoor ports > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: COUCHDB-2980 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2980 > Project: CouchDB > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Replication > Affects Versions: 2.0.0 > Reporter: Robert Kowalski > Priority: Blocker > > If you POST a doc into the replicator database a replication is kicked off > and finishes successfully (usual 5984 port which maps to 15984 via haproxy). > The problem is that the DB is replicated to the backdoor ports (15986) and is > not visible on the other ports. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)