rnewson commented on issue #1425: URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/issues/1425#issuecomment-1887678038
Agreeing with both, this is a consequence of the number passing through a Javascript engine, rather than anything inherent to couchdb itself. You can store an _integer_ field in a couchdb document that goes well beyond that (as erlang supports multi-precision ints), but avoiding all JS paths is a bit trickier. a json index would avoid it, as would a built-in reduce. Also agreeing that if you want numeric precision beyond 64-bit floating point within Javascript you'll need to store them as something other than a JSON number (strings, say), and then use a math library to manipulate them (noting that math.js has a serialization format that's a JSON object with string values). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@couchdb.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
