aman-ak-r opened a new pull request, #5800:
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/5800

   This PR fixes the Credo 1.7.14 warnings introduced by the 
`ExpensiveEmptyEnumCheck` check.
   
   ## Changes
   
   Replaced expensive `length/1` checks with `Enum.empty?/1` in 4 test files:
   - `test/elixir/test/replication_test.exs` - Line 1674
   - `test/elixir/lib/couch/dbtest.ex` - Line 199
   - `test/elixir/test/partition_size_limit_test.exs` - Line 231
   - `test/elixir/test/basics_test.exs` - Line 67
   
   ## Rationale
   
   The `Enum.empty?/1` function is more performant than `length/1` for checking 
if a list is empty because:
   - `Enum.empty?/1` only needs to check if there's at least one element
   - `length/1` must traverse the entire list to count all elements
   
   These changes are semantically equivalent:
   - `length(list) > 0` ≡ `not Enum.empty?(list)`
   - `length(list) >= 1` ≡ `not Enum.empty?(list)`
   
   ## Testing
   
   All changes are in test files and maintain the same logical behavior. The 
modifications follow Elixir best practices for performance optimization.
   
   Fixes #5799Replace expensive length/1 checks with Enum.empty?/1 in test 
files to resolve Credo warnings introduced in version 1.7.14.
   
   Changes:
   - test/elixir/test/replication_test.exs: Replace length(list) > 0
   - test/elixir/lib/couch/dbtest.ex: Replace length(list) > 0
   - test/elixir/test/partition_size_limit_test.exs: Replace length(list) > 0
   - test/elixir/test/basics_test.exs: Replace length(list) >= 1
   
   These changes are semantically equivalent but more performant as 
Enum.empty?/1 only checks for the first element instead of traversing the 
entire list.
   
   Fixes #5799
   
   <!-- Thank you for your contribution!
   
        Please file this form by replacing the Markdown comments
        with your text. If a section needs no action - remove it.
   
        Also remember, that CouchDB uses the Review-Then-Commit (RTC) model
        of code collaboration. Positive feedback is represented +1 from 
committers
        and negative is a -1. The -1 also means veto, and needs to be addressed
        to proceed. Once there are no objections, the PR can be merged by a
        CouchDB committer.
   
        See: http://couchdb.apache.org/bylaws.html#decisions for more info. -->
   
   ## Overview
   
   <!-- Please give a short brief for the pull request,
        what problem it solves or how it makes things better. -->
   
   ## Testing recommendations
   
   <!-- Describe how we can test your changes.
        Does it provide any behaviour that the end users
        could notice? -->
   
   ## Related Issues or Pull Requests
   
   <!-- If your changes affect multiple components in different
        repositories please put links to those issues or pull requests here.  
-->
   
   ## Checklist
   
   - [ ] Code is written and works correctly
   - [ ] Changes are covered by tests
   - [ ] Any new configurable parameters are documented in 
`rel/overlay/etc/default.ini`
   - [ ] Documentation changes were made in the `src/docs` folder
   - [ ] Documentation changes were backported (separated PR) to affected 
branches
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to