[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13747590#comment-13747590
]
Pei Chen commented on CTAKES-226:
---------------------------------
James,
Along the same question as Stephen on how this (1,2) will be used (used for
debugging purposes?)-
Is this something that you would need stored in the CAS, or do you think if
added a logger.debug() level output for the dictionary hit related items
sufficient?
> CEM Templates- In the xxxMentions locations/severity store Annotation instead
> of the BinaryTextRelation
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CTAKES-226
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-226
> Project: cTAKES
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 3.1
> Reporter: Pei Chen
> Fix For: future enhancement
>
>
> > Hi James/Steven,
> > In the common type system/template fillers, do you recall why we
> > stored the TextRelation instead of the resolved annotation?
> >
> > For example, in SignSymptomMention, getBodyLocation() returns
> > LocationOfTextRelation.
> > So in order to actually get the AnatomicalSiteMention, you would have
> > to look inside LocationOfTextRelation arg1 or arg2.
> >
> > I think it be more intuitive and simpler for consumers of the CEM's to
> > just store the AnatomicalSiteMention? Is there a use case I am
> > missing where someone would want something different than the
> > SignSymptomMention.getBodyLocation() other than the actual
> > AnatomicalSiteMention?
> Email Thread:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ctakes-dev/201308.mbox/%3C924DE05C19409B438EB81DE683A942D910588E15%40CHEXMBX1A.CHBOSTON.ORG%3E
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
