JinwooHwang opened a new pull request, #8039:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/8039

   Backports 10 commits from `develop` to `support/2.0` for the 2.0.3 release.
   
   Opened primarily to get CI coverage — in particular `integrationTest` and 
`checkPom`, which have not been run against these changes locally.
   
   ## Security remediations (dependency upgrades)
   
   | Advisory | Component | Change | JIRA | Upstream PR |
   |---|---|---|---|---|
   | CVE-2026-54428 | httpcore5, httpcore5-h2 | 5.3.6 → 5.4.3 | GEODE-10590 | 
#8016 |
   | GHSA-2m67-wjpj-xhg9 | Jackson | 2.21.2 → 2.21.5 | GEODE-10589 | #8015 |
   | CVE-2026-40984 | Micrometer | 1.14.0 → 1.15.12 | GEODE-10592 | #8018 |
   | CVE-2026-8763 | Bouncy Castle | 1.84 → 1.85 | GEODE-10606 | #8032 |
   | CVE-2026-10050 | Jetty | 12.0.33 → 12.0.37 | GEODE-10605 | #8031 |
   | CVE-2026-49268 | Apache Shiro | 2.1.0 → 3.0.0 | GEODE-10607 | #8033 |
   | SNYK-JAVA-ORGAPACHELOGGINGLOG4J-17954276 | Log4j | 2.25.4 → 2.25.5 | 
GEODE-10604 | #8030 |
   
   Transitive: slf4j-api 2.0.17 → 2.0.18, asm 9.9.1 → 9.10.1.
   
   ## Security hardening
   
   - **GEODE-10598** (#8024) — Removed 
`ServerSerializableObjectHttpMessageConverter` from the management REST 
servlet, eliminating an unrestricted Java deserialization path. `gfsh` now 
sends `queryNames` as request parameters rather than a serialized request body.
   - **GEODE-10599** (#8025) — The remaining query-expression deserialization 
now uses `ValidatingObjectInputStream`, restricted to `javax.management.*`, 
`java.lang.*`, `java.util.*`.
   
   ## Fixes
   
   - **GEODE-10610** (#8036) — Fixes `gfsh list members` failure by adding 
`jline-terminal-jni` and `jline-terminal-ffm` 3.26.3.
   
   ## Deviations from upstream
   
   Five commits did not apply verbatim and were resolved by hand. Details are 
in the individual commit messages.
   
   - **Micrometer (GEODE-10592)** is a *partial* backport of #8018. Only the 
micrometer bump was taken. That commit's GitHub Actions version pinning targets 
develop's workflow files, and its shiro 2.2.1 → 2.1.0 change was a revert of 
#8017 and is a no-op here.
   - **#8017 was deliberately skipped.** Its shiro 2.2.1 change was reverted by 
#8018 on develop and superseded by #8033, which is taken here instead.
   - **#8033, #8032, #8031** were applied out of develop's original order, so 
their conflict regions carried older context. Only each commit's own dependency 
change was taken; unrelated develop drift (jetty, log4j, snakeyaml, bcprov 
versions from neighbouring commits) was not.
   - **#8033** additionally carried two defects that were corrected upstream by 
#8035 and are not reproduced here: a corrupted fixture line (`jetty-io-1git 
2.0.37.jar`) and `jul-to-slf4j` listed as 2.0.18, which does not match what the 
build resolves.
   
   ## Compatibility notes for the release
   
   - Apache Shiro **3.0.0 is a major version upgrade**. Custom 
`SecurityManager` or `Realm` implementations written against Shiro 2.x may 
require changes.
   - GEODE-10598 **changes the management REST wire format**. A 2.0.2 `gfsh` 
talking to a 2.0.3 cluster (or the reverse) will fail on `queryNames`. `gfsh` 
and the cluster should be upgraded together.
   
   ## Verification status
   
   Passed locally:
   
   ```
   ./gradlew clean spA build install javadoc spotlessCheck resolveDependencies 
pmdMain japicmp test -x rat -x checkPom
   ```
   
   **Not yet run:** `integrationTest` and `checkPom`. Both matter here, because 
the conflict resolutions edited the integration-test fixtures 
(`assembly_content.txt`, `gfsh_dependency_classpath.txt`, 
`dependency_classpath.txt`, `expected_jars.txt`) and the expected POMs by hand 
rather than regenerating them. Those files encode this branch's resolved 
dependency graph, which differs from develop's, so upstream's CI results do not 
carry over. Getting CI to check them is the main purpose of this PR.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to