[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17213852#comment-17213852
]
Daniil Ovchinnikov commented on GROOVY-9779:
--------------------------------------------
After this change the following tests pass:
{code:groovy}
assertScript '''
class C {
def call() { return 42 }
}
class C1 {
def call = new C()
}
class C2 {
def call = new C1()
}
class C3 {
def call = new C2()
}
class D {
final y = new C3()
}
assert new D().y() == 42
'''
{code}
{code:groovy}
assertScript '''
class C {
def call(a) { return 42 }
}
class C1 {
def call = new C()
}
class C2 {
def plus = new C1()
}
assert new C2() + 1 == 42
'''
{code}
> Inconsistency with callable properties in static context
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GROOVY-9779
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9779
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.0.6
> Reporter: Daniil Ovchinnikov
> Assignee: Eric Milles
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.7, 4.0.0-alpha-2
>
> Time Spent: 0.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> {code:title=playground.groovy}
> class C {
> def call() {
> 42
> }
> }
> class Container {
> static final staticC = new C()
> def instanceC = new C()
> }
> assert Container.staticC() == 42 // works fine
> def container = new Container()
> assert container.staticC() == 42 // MissingMethodException
> assert container.instanceC() == 42 // MissingMethodException
> {code}
> I'd expect the invocations to fail or to work in both static and instance
> contexts.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
