paulk-asert commented on pull request #1597: URL: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/1597#issuecomment-861128490
Well, I think compliance is well-defined for primitive boolean and the spec says nothing about "is" ever being supported for the wrapper classes. We know of different frameworks which have made different choices about what the silence in the spec for wrapper classes means. Our past behavior has mostly been about trying not to get in the way of other framework/library choices which is somewhat short of fully clarifying our behavior. I don't know whether the strict interpretation that you propose is best or perhaps ignore the isser for Boolean unless there is an isser and no getter. That might be more backwards compatible. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
