[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eric Milles updated GROOVY-10717:
---------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.0.14
> Map to type coercion not working on abstract classes
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GROOVY-10717
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10717
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.0.11, 4.0.2
> Reporter: Josh DeWitt
> Assignee: Eric Milles
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 4.0.6, 3.0.14
>
>
> I sometimes use maps as mock objects for test cases. One test case started
> failing with groovy 3.0.11 and 4.0.2 where a map was being used as a mock for
> an abstract class. Here is a simplified version of what is now failing. Note
> that it does not fail if A is *not* abstract:
> {code:java}
> abstract class A {
> String b
> }
> def a = [getB: { 'string b' }] as A
> assert 'string b' == a.b{code}
>
> I also noticed that I don't get an UnsupportedOperationException when calling
> functions that were not implemented in the map as described in
> [https://groovy-lang.org/semantics.html#_map_to_type_coercion].
> MissingPropertyException seems to be working, though I can't seem to find a
> way to get MissingMethodException.
> {code:java}
> abstract class A {
> String b
> String c
> }
> def a = [getB: { 'string b' }, getD: { 'string d' }] as A
> assert null != a.c // Should get UnsupportedOperationException (doesn't work)
> assert null != a.d // Should get MissingPropertyException (works)
> assert null != a.getD() // Should get MissingMethodException (doesn't work)
> {code}
>
> Possibly related to GROOVY-8243?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
