[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17800736#comment-17800736
]
Paul King commented on GROOVY-11258:
------------------------------------
Just to show the native way you'd do that assertion (without assertj):
{code}
void mapping() {
assert somePojos()*.x.toSet() == ['a', 'b'] as Set
}
{code}
> AssertJ collection mapping is badly supported
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GROOVY-11258
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11258
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Static Type Checker
> Affects Versions: 4.0.17
> Reporter: Jan Hackel
> Priority: Major
>
> The following code will fail with the message
> {noformat}
> [Static type checking] - No such property: x for class: java.lang.Object
> @ line 8, column 13.
> .map{ it.x }
> ^
> {noformat}
> {code:groovy}
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> class AssertJCollectionMappingTest {
> @org.junit.jupiter.api.Test
> void mapping() {
> def texts = somePojos()
> org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat(texts)
> .map{ it.x }
> .containsExactlyInAnyOrderElementsOf(['a', 'b'])
> }
> private static Collection<Pojo> somePojos() {
> return [new Pojo(x: 'a'), new Pojo(x: 'b')]
> }
> static class Pojo {
> String x
> }
> }
> {code}
> Changing the line to
> {noformat}
> .map({ it.x } as Function<Pojo, String>)
> {noformat}
> makes it compile but it is clumsy for more complicated types.
> It would be nice if Groovy was able to resolve the types without hints.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
