[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18007848#comment-18007848
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-11715:
-----------------------------------------

jdaugherty commented on PR #2267:
URL: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/2267#issuecomment-3084381682

   Thank you @paulk-asert 




> Grails reproducible build part 3: @DelegatesTo ordering
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-11715
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11715
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Paul King
>            Assignee: Paul King
>            Priority: Major
>
> We have fixed a few previous issues. This is the last remaining one that we 
> know of. The symptoms are that on subsequent builds of the Grails project, 
> the order in which annotation attributes are written into the bytecode 
> varies, e.g.:
> {code:groovy}
> public void render(@groovy.lang.DelegatesTo(
>     strategy = 1,
>     type = "",
>     value = groovy.lang.DelegatesTo.Target.class,
>     target = "",
>     genericTypeIndex = -1) groovy.lang.Closure closure) { /* compiled code */ 
> }
> {code}
> vs
> {code:groovy}
> public void render(@groovy.lang.DelegatesTo(
>     strategy = 1,
>     genericTypeIndex = -1,
>     type = "",
>     value = groovy.lang.DelegatesTo.Target.class,
>     target = "") groovy.lang.Closure closure) { /* compiled code */ }
> {code}
> While these are logically equivalent, the arbitrary ordering hinders 
> reproducibility.
> Unlike the previous cases where we understood where the non-determinism was 
> probably coming from, here we haven't tracked down the root cause. 
> Never-the-less, it seems worth tackling the symptoms for now and we can 
> always back out the current changes if we can find a more direct fix.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to