[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18016832#comment-18016832
 ] 

Eric Milles commented on GROOVY-11721:
--------------------------------------

Using a global transform to add an annotation in phase Semantic Analysis or 
later will not have that annotation scanned by {{ASTTransformationVisitor}}, 
which also runs in the Semantic Analysis phase.  I tried a transform that adds 
the {{Field}} transform during Conversion phase and it was picked up by the 
transform visitor and the {{FieldASTTransformation}} was run appropriately.

Using an {{AnnotationCollector}} annotation seems to work as well, since the 
{{AnnotationCollectorTransform}} runs during Semantic Analysis before the 
{{ASTTransformationVisitor}}.

It is also possible to add the necessary transform during your scanning using 
{{compilationUnit.addPhaseOperation}} to mimic what 
{{ASTTransformationVisitor}} would do when it sees the {{Field}} annotation.

All of these should be cross-compatible if your IDE is processing your source 
through at least the Semantic Analysis phase.

> @groovy.transform.Field to annotate a script class
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-11721
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11721
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>    Affects Versions: 5.0.0-beta-2
>            Reporter: Bartosz Popiela
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: image-2025-08-27-14-08-33-523.png, 
> image-2025-08-28-02-47-30-911.png
>
>
> We use undeclared Groovy Scripts together with JUnit for writing unit tests 
> because it supports sentences as method names and doesn’t impose restrictions 
> on the file name (we need the test script name to match the name of the YAML 
> file being tested). This solution works very well; the only downside is that 
> in order to use annotations on a field, such as [email protected]_, we 
> also need to use [email protected]_, since those annotations typically 
> don’t have target = LOCAL_VARIABLE. It would be convenient if _@Field_ could 
> be placed on the script class (with _@Inherited_ to support a base script) 
> and be automatically applied to all local variables in the script



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to