[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18072954#comment-18072954
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-11905:
-----------------------------------------

Copilot commented on code in PR #2438:
URL: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/2438#discussion_r3069450630


##########
src/main/java/org/codehaus/groovy/ast/ClassNode.java:
##########
@@ -1452,17 +1452,21 @@ public ClassNode getOuterClass() {
         return null;
     }
 
+    private List<ClassNode> outerClasses;
     public List<ClassNode> getOuterClasses() {
+        List<ClassNode> ocs = outerClasses;
+        if (ocs != null) return ocs;
+
         ClassNode outer = getOuterClass();
         if (outer == null) {
-            return Collections.emptyList();
+            return outerClasses = Collections.emptyList();
         }
         List<ClassNode> result = new ArrayList<>(4);
         do {
             result.add(outer);
         } while ((outer = outer.getOuterClass()) != null);
 
-        return result;
+        return outerClasses = Collections.unmodifiableList(result);

Review Comment:
   `getOuterClasses()` now caches the computed list in a field, but the 
implementation doesn’t account for redirect/proxy `ClassNode`s. Since 
`setRedirect(...)` can be called later for non-primary nodes, a proxy may cache 
`Collections.emptyList()` (or an outdated chain) before redirect is set/changed 
and then return stale results thereafter. Consider delegating to 
`redirect().getOuterClasses()` when `redirect != null` and/or clearing 
`outerClasses` in `setRedirect(...)` to keep the cache correct.





> Optimize non-capturing lambdas
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-11905
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11905
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Daniel Sun
>            Priority: Major
>
> *Problem* Previously, every non-capturing lambda call site incurred 
> unnecessary allocation overhead. The compiler would:
>  # Generate a {{Closure}} wrapper instance via {{NEW}} + 
> {{{}INVOKESPECIAL{}}}.
>  # Pass it as a captured argument to the {{invokedynamic}} instruction.
> This forced {{LambdaMetafactory}} to generate a new proxy instance per 
> invocation, completely defeating JVM singleton optimizations.
> *Solution* For non-capturing lambdas (no shared variables, no instance member 
> access), we now align the compilation strategy with Java's behavior by 
> eliminating the capture phase. The new emitted bytecode features:
>  * A {{static}} modifier on the generated {{doCall}} method.
>  * A capture-free {{invokedynamic}} instruction with the descriptor 
> {{{}()LFunctionalInterface;{}}}.
>  * An {{H_INVOKESTATIC}} method handle pointing directly to the static 
> {{{}doCall{}}}.
> *Impact*
>  * {{LambdaMetafactory}} now creates and caches a singleton instance, 
> returning a {{{}ConstantCallSite{}}}.
>  * Achieves *zero-allocation* at the call site for non-capturing lambdas.
>  * Matches standard Java execution behavior, significantly reducing GC 
> footprint.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to