[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Paul King updated GROOVY-11482:
-------------------------------
    Component/s: Documentation

> Improve documentation using method categories
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-11482
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11482
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Documentation
>            Reporter: Paul King
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: contrib
>         Attachments: image-2024-09-23-20-34-29-532.png, 
> image-2024-09-23-20-39-02-272.png
>
>
> This is a placeholder to investigate whether we can use the ideas in the 
> following article to improve our documentation:
> [https://donraab.medium.com/associating-method-categories-with-emojis-in-intellij-and-javadoc-a82aebe1e903]
> The structure view within IDEA might look like this:
> !image-2024-09-23-20-39-02-272.png!
> The Javadoc might look like this:
> !image-2024-09-23-20-34-29-532.png!
> These pictures are for a mock up of {{DefaultGroovyMethods}}.
> We'd need to consider several issues including:
> * Can we use some of the ideas without any tooling tweaks needed?
> * Would we apply these ideas to extension methods (as per above) or 
> non-extension methods, or both?
> * Do we need to adapt DocGenerator to better support these ideas?
> * Do we need to adapt Groovydoc to better support these ideas?
> * For some classes we arrange methods in alphabetical order. We'd possibly 
> have to re-order to be alphabetical within the regions. Would we be happy 
> with this?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to