[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-12164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18096093#comment-18096093
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-12164:
-----------------------------------------
paulk-asert opened a new pull request, #2710:
URL: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/2710
A closure with a typed parameter generates call(T)/doCall(T) rather than
call(Object), which the GROOVY-11911 CallOverride lookup cannot see, so every
such call fell back to full metaclass dispatch (~2.5x slower via DGM
iteration). Cache the single unambiguous typed one-arg override with an
instance-of guard (boxed for primitives): exact-instance arguments dispatch
directly; anything needing Groovy coercion (GString->String, number
conversions, null) still falls through to the metaclass, which behaves exactly
as before. Untyped closures are unaffected.
> Closure.call fast path misses closures with typed parameters (~6x slower via
> full metaclass dispatch)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GROOVY-12164
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-12164
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Paul King
> Priority: Major
>
> Description:
> The Closure.call(Object...) fast path added in GROOVY-11911 caches a direct
> doCall/call Method per closure subclass (CallOverride, keyed via
> {{type.getMethod("call", Object.class)}}). A generated closure class only
> declares a {{call(Object)}} override when its doCall takes Object — i.e. when
> the closure parameter is untyped ({{it}} or {{ { x -> } }}). A closure with a
> *typed* parameter generates {{doCall(Integer)}}/{{call(Integer)}}, which the
> Object-signature lookup cannot see, so CallOverride resolves to NONE and every
> invocation falls back to full {{getMetaClass().invokeMethod(this, "doCall",
> args)}} dispatch.
> Since callers dispatch through the static type Closure (e.g. every DGM
> iteration method calls {{closure.call(item)}} from Java), the typed
> {{call(Integer)}} overload on the generated class is never selected either.
> Net effect: annotating a closure parameter with its type — normally good
> practice — costs roughly 3-6x in per-element dispatch overhead.
> Measurements (steady-state, median of 9 trials, isolated JVM per variant,
> 12-element List, @CompileStatic enclosing class, JDK 23, master):
> || closure || param || capture || ops/ms ||
> | {{ { x -> s += (int) x } }} (each) | untyped | Reference | 13,408 |
> | {{ { it * it } }} (collect) | untyped | none | 13,173 |
> | {{ { Integer x -> x * x } }} (collect) | typed | none | 4,148 |
> | {{ { Integer x -> s += x } }} (collect) | typed | Reference | 3,606 |
> | {{ { Integer x -> a[0] += x } }} (each) | typed | int[] | 2,471 |
> | {{ { Integer x -> s += x } }} (each) | typed | Reference | 2,229 |
> The typed/untyped split is the dominant factor; capture kind and
> each-vs-collect are second-order.
> Possible fixes (either restores the fast path for typed params):
> 1. Extend CallOverride.lookup to also accept a single-arg typed override
> (resolve the closure's declared one-arg call/doCall whatever its parameter
> type), with an argument compatibility/coercion guard before the cached
> reflective invoke so metaclass coercion semantics (GString->String,
> number conversions, null handling) are preserved, falling back to
> invokeMethod on mismatch.
> 2. Have ClosureWriter always emit a coercing {{call(Object)}} bridge alongside
> the typed doCall (castToType to the declared parameter type, then direct
> doCall), so the existing Object-signature lookup finds every generated
> closure class.
> Option 2 keeps the runtime lookup untouched and localises the semantics in
> generated code, but adds a method per closure class; option 1 is
> runtime-only and also covers pre-existing compiled classes.
> Discovered while benchmarking GROOVY-12151 (closure packing): the packed
> adapter dispatches typed parameters via checkcast/unbox in a generated
> dispatch table and is unaffected, which initially made generated closure
> classes look artificially slow in the typed-parameter comparison.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)