[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-12606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Scott Murphy Heiberg updated GROOVY-12606:
------------------------------------------
    Description: 
{code:groovy}
import java.util.function.Supplier

@groovy.transform.CompileStatic // or @TypeChecked
class C {
    static String take(Supplier<Supplier<String>> s) { s.get().get() }
    static void main(args) {
        Closure<String> c = { 'x' }
        assert take { c } == 'x'
        assert take(() -> c) == 'x'
    }
}
{code}
Actual:
{noformat}
[Static type checking] - Cannot return value of type 
groovy.lang.Closure<java.lang.String> for closure expecting 
java.util.function.Supplier<java.lang.String>
[Static type checking] - Cannot return value of type 
groovy.lang.Closure<java.lang.String> for lambda expecting 
java.util.function.Supplier<java.lang.String>
{noformat}
Expected: both calls compile and the returned closure is converted to the 
functional interface, as it is when a Closure value is passed as a Supplier 
argument. A Closure<Integer> should still be rejected.

The return check for closures and lambdas only accepts subtypes of the expected 
return type and does not consider closure-to-SAM coercion. A returned closure 
literal and a raw Closure are rejected the same way. Under static compilation, 
a lambda also needs its generated method to declare the SAM type, so that the 
returned closure is converted instead of being returned as a Closure.

Seen in 4.0.33, 5.0.8 and 6.0.0.

PR: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/3133

  was:
{code:groovy}
import java.util.function.Supplier

@groovy.transform.CompileStatic // or @TypeChecked
class C {
    static String take(Supplier<Supplier<String>> s) { s.get().get() }
    static void main(args) {
        Closure<String> c = { 'x' }
        assert take { c } == 'x'
        assert take(() -> c) == 'x'
    }
}
{code}
Actual:
{noformat}
[Static type checking] - Cannot return value of type 
groovy.lang.Closure<java.lang.String> for closure expecting 
java.util.function.Supplier<java.lang.String>
[Static type checking] - Cannot return value of type 
groovy.lang.Closure<java.lang.String> for lambda expecting 
java.util.function.Supplier<java.lang.String>
{noformat}
Expected: both calls compile and the returned closure is converted to the 
functional interface, as it is when a Closure value is passed as a Supplier 
argument. A Closure<Integer> should still be rejected.

The return check for closures and lambdas only accepts subtypes of the expected 
return type and does not consider closure-to-SAM coercion. A returned closure 
literal and a raw Closure are rejected the same way. Under static compilation, 
a lambda also needs its generated method to declare the SAM type, so that the 
returned closure is converted instead of being returned as a Closure.

Seen in 4.0.33, 5.0.8 and 6.0.0.


> STC rejects a closure or lambda returning a Closure<R> value where a 
> functional interface return type is expected
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-12606
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-12606
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.0.33, 5.0.8, 6.0.0
>            Reporter: Scott Murphy Heiberg
>            Priority: Major
>
> {code:groovy}
> import java.util.function.Supplier
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic // or @TypeChecked
> class C {
>     static String take(Supplier<Supplier<String>> s) { s.get().get() }
>     static void main(args) {
>         Closure<String> c = { 'x' }
>         assert take { c } == 'x'
>         assert take(() -> c) == 'x'
>     }
> }
> {code}
> Actual:
> {noformat}
> [Static type checking] - Cannot return value of type 
> groovy.lang.Closure<java.lang.String> for closure expecting 
> java.util.function.Supplier<java.lang.String>
> [Static type checking] - Cannot return value of type 
> groovy.lang.Closure<java.lang.String> for lambda expecting 
> java.util.function.Supplier<java.lang.String>
> {noformat}
> Expected: both calls compile and the returned closure is converted to the 
> functional interface, as it is when a Closure value is passed as a Supplier 
> argument. A Closure<Integer> should still be rejected.
> The return check for closures and lambdas only accepts subtypes of the 
> expected return type and does not consider closure-to-SAM coercion. A 
> returned closure literal and a raw Closure are rejected the same way. Under 
> static compilation, a lambda also needs its generated method to declare the 
> SAM type, so that the returned closure is converted instead of being returned 
> as a Closure.
> Seen in 4.0.33, 5.0.8 and 6.0.0.
> PR: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/3133



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v10.3.26#10030026)

Reply via email to