[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-12667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Scott Murphy Heiberg updated GROOVY-12667:
------------------------------------------
    Affects Version/s: 5.1.3
                           (was: 7.0.0-alpha-1)

> Implicit-this call in a DELEGATE_FIRST closure with a null delegate throws 
> NullPointerException instead of calling the owner
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-12667
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-12667
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.0.33, 5.0.8, 5.1.3, 6.0.0
>            Reporter: Scott Murphy Heiberg
>            Priority: Major
>
> {code:groovy}
> class Owner {
>     def foo() { 'owner' }
>     def test() {
>         def c = { -> foo() }
>         c.resolveStrategy = Closure.DELEGATE_FIRST
>         c.delegate = null
>         c()
>     }
> }
> assert new Owner().test() == 'owner'
> {code}
> *Actual:* {{java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke method foo() on 
> null object}}. The same happens for OWNER_FIRST with a null owner (the 
> delegate is never tried), for a dehydrated closure, and for a method that 
> neither candidate has (NPE instead of MissingMethodException). Since 
> GROOVY-11858, {{toString()}} in such a closure returns "null" and 
> {{is(null)}} returns true, because they run against NullObject.
> *Expected:* a null delegate (or owner) is skipped and the other candidate 
> answers, as in Groovy 3 and as property access ({{Closure.getProperty}}) 
> still does. When neither answers, a MissingMethodException is thrown.
> Cause: GROOVY-7232 removed the {{instanceof GroovyObject}} check from the 
> DELEGATE_FIRST and OWNER_FIRST branches of {{ClosureMetaClass.invokeMethod}}, 
> which also let a null delegate or owner through to 
> {{InvokerHelper.invokeMethod(null, ...)}}.
> Verified: 4.0.33, 5.0.8, 6.0.0 and master affected; 3.0.25 and 2.4.15 not 
> affected.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v10.3.26#10030026)

Reply via email to