[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-12727?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18140476#comment-18140476
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-12727:
-----------------------------------------

codecov-commenter commented on PR #3265:
URL: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/3265#issuecomment-6716202858

   ## 
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/groovy/pull/3265?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)
 Report
   :x: Patch coverage is `96.15385%` with `1 line` in your changes missing 
coverage. Please review.
   :white_check_mark: Project coverage is 74.4101%. Comparing base 
([`5222105`](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/groovy/commit/52221051ab78f260b1461b53ba071231ec150b57?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache))
 to head 
([`60711c7`](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/groovy/commit/60711c7487213a9afc468708de98cf021f0408d3?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)).
   :warning: Report is 1 commits behind head on master.
   
   | [Files with missing 
lines](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/groovy/pull/3265?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)
 | Patch % | Lines |
   |---|---|---|
   | 
[...roovy/transform/stc/StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/groovy/pull/3265?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=src%2Fmain%2Fjava%2Forg%2Fcodehaus%2Fgroovy%2Ftransform%2Fstc%2FStaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache#diff-c3JjL21haW4vamF2YS9vcmcvY29kZWhhdXMvZ3Jvb3Z5L3RyYW5zZm9ybS9zdGMvU3RhdGljVHlwZUNoZWNraW5nVmlzaXRvci5qYXZh)
 | 96.1538% | [0 Missing and 1 partial :warning: 
](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/groovy/pull/3265?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)
 |
   
   <details><summary>Additional details and impacted files</summary>
   
   
   
   [![Impacted file tree 
graph](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/groovy/pull/3265/graphs/tree.svg?width=650&height=150&src=pr&token=1r45138NfQ&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/groovy/pull/3265?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)
   
   ```diff
   @@                Coverage Diff                 @@
   ##               master      #3265        +/-   ##
   ==================================================
   + Coverage     74.4085%   74.4101%   +0.0016%     
   - Complexity      44367      44386        +19     
   ==================================================
     Files            1699       1699                
     Lines          151050     151075        +25     
     Branches        28783      28792         +9     
   ==================================================
   + Hits           112394     112415        +21     
   - Misses          28376      28378         +2     
   - Partials        10280      10282         +2     
   ```
   
   | [Files with missing 
lines](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/groovy/pull/3265?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)
 | Coverage Δ | |
   |---|---|---|
   | 
[...roovy/transform/stc/StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/groovy/pull/3265?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=src%2Fmain%2Fjava%2Forg%2Fcodehaus%2Fgroovy%2Ftransform%2Fstc%2FStaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache#diff-c3JjL21haW4vamF2YS9vcmcvY29kZWhhdXMvZ3Jvb3Z5L3RyYW5zZm9ybS9zdGMvU3RhdGljVHlwZUNoZWNraW5nVmlzaXRvci5qYXZh)
 | `88.0860% <96.1538%> (+0.0407%)` | :arrow_up: |
   
   ... and [14 files with indirect coverage 
changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/groovy/pull/3265/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)
   </details>
   <details><summary> :rocket: New features to boost your workflow: </summary>
   
   - :snowflake: [Test 
Analytics](https://docs.codecov.com/docs/test-analytics): Detect flaky tests, 
report on failures, and find test suite problems.
   - :package: [JS Bundle 
Analysis](https://docs.codecov.com/docs/javascript-bundle-analysis): Save 
yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.
   </details>




> STC: a generic method's type parameter isn't inferred from the return-type 
> target when the argument is a lambda
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-12727
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-12727
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Paul King
>            Priority: Major
>
> Under {{@TypeChecked}} (and {{@CompileStatic}}), when a generic method's only 
> argument is an implicitly typed lambda, the type parameter is not inferred 
> from the expected return type. The lambda's parameter is typed with a 
> wildcard ({{Ctx<? extends Object>}}), and a call inside the lambda that needs 
> the concrete type is rejected. javac infers {{T = String}} from the 
> return-type target and compiles the equivalent Java.
> This is the standard Apache Pekko (and Akka) typed-actor factory, 
> {{Behaviors.setup(context -> new MyActor(context))}}, so statically compiled 
> Pekko code needs a type witness or an explicitly typed lambda parameter.
> h3. Repro (no dependencies)
> {code:groovy}
> import java.util.function.Function
> import groovy.transform.TypeChecked
> class Ctx<T> {}
> class Beh<T> {}
> class Behaviors {
>     static <T> Beh<T> setup(Function<Ctx<T>, Beh<T>> factory) { 
> factory.apply(new Ctx<T>()) }
> }
> class Bot extends Beh<String> {
>     Bot(Ctx<String> c, int max) {}
> }
> @TypeChecked
> class M {
>     static Beh<String> lambda(int max) { Behaviors.setup(c -> new Bot(c, 
> max)) }
> }
> {code}
> h3. Actual
> {noformat}
> [Static type checking] - Cannot call Bot#<init>(Ctx<java.lang.String>, int) 
> with arguments [Ctx<? extends java.lang.Object>, int]
> {noformat}
> h3. Expected
> Compiles, as the Java equivalent does with javac ({{T}} inferred as 
> {{String}} from the {{Beh<String>}} return type).
> h3. Workarounds (both compile on 6.0.0)
> {code:groovy}
> Behaviors.<String>setup(c -> new Bot(c, max))                 // explicit 
> type witness
> Behaviors.setup((Ctx<String> c) -> new Bot(c, max))          // explicitly 
> typed lambda parameter
> {code}
> h3. Notes
> * The closure form, Behaviors.setup \{ c -> new Bot(c, max) }, fails with the 
> same message.
> * An assignment target fails the same way as a return target: {{Beh<String> b 
> = Behaviors.setup(c -> new Bot(c, max))}}.
> * Possibly related, not duplicates:
> ** GROOVY-11446: target-type handling for a generic method with wildcards, in 
> the opposite direction (accepted when it should fail).
> ** GROOVY-11077: lambda parameter types from a wildcard SAM; no generic 
> method or inference involved.
> ** GROOVY-12714 / PR #3246: javac-compatibility changes to wildcard 
> containment in the same visitor; they don't appear to supply this inference 
> (not verified against the branch).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v10.3.26#10030026)

Reply via email to