rpuch commented on code in PR #2761:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/2761#discussion_r1375800162
##########
modules/table/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/table/distributed/replicator/PartitionReplicaListener.java:
##########
@@ -472,34 +472,30 @@ private CompletableFuture<?>
processRequest(ReplicaRequest request, @Nullable Bo
}
}
- return waitForSchemasBeforeReading(request)
- .thenCompose(unused -> validateTableExistence(request))
- .thenCompose(opStartTimestamp ->
processOperationRequest(request, isPrimary, senderId, opStartTimestamp));
+ HybridTimestamp opTsIfDirectRo = (request instanceof
ReadOnlyDirectReplicaRequest) ? hybridClock.now() : null;
+
+ return validateTableExistence(request, opTsIfDirectRo)
+ .thenCompose(unused -> validateSchemaMatch(request,
opTsIfDirectRo))
+ .thenCompose(unused -> waitForSchemasBeforeReading(request,
opTsIfDirectRo))
+ .thenCompose(opStartTimestamp ->
processOperationRequest(request, isPrimary, senderId, opTsIfDirectRo));
}
/**
- * Makes sure that we have schemas corresponding to the moment of tx
start; this makes PK extraction safe WRT
- * {@link org.apache.ignite.internal.schema.SchemaRegistry#schema(int)}.
+ * Validates that the table exists at a timestamp corresponding to the
request operation.
*
- * @param request Request that's being processed.
+ * <ul>
+ * <li>For an RW read/write, it's 'now'</li>
Review Comment:
There are writes, RW reads and RO reads. This is about RW reads and writes,
but if we change it the way you suggest it will be about any of 3
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]