quantranhong1999 commented on PR #2884: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/2884#issuecomment-3652643044
> > Seems no blob module for the JPA app. Should we revert the strong type commit for BlobId, or bind a PlainBlobId factory for it cc @chibenwa ? > > I would say keeping the strong type is better here, binding a PlainBlobId factory for jpa should be alright? IMO, we should not. Forcing the "blob" concept into the JPA app where it does not know or does not use seems wrong to me. I think I will revert the strong type commit and let this PR move forward. If needed, we can comeback on this later. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
