[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15156741#comment-15156741
]
Ignasi Barrera commented on JCLOUDS-1086:
-----------------------------------------
Just to be clear: we really appreciate all contributions that have been made.
It is not easy to get used to the codebase and we really appreciate the effort
made to write code that follows the jclouds standards and has the expected
quality. All you're contributions are review-friendly and that's great. With my
previous comment I just wanted to avoid what could become a trend, making it
clear that jclouds as a whole has a purpose. The labs repo is an incubation
repo for PoCs and new ideas, but in the end, what comes out from there must be
something that serves the jclouds purpose.
> Thoughts on an Artifactory provider
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: JCLOUDS-1086
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1086
> Project: jclouds
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: jclouds-labs
> Reporter: Christopher Dancy
> Labels: jclouds-labs
>
> Much like the on-going work we're doing with the jclouds-labs/etcd provider
> we'd like to create an Artifactory provider.
> https://www.jfrog.com/artifactory/
> This provider would be based around their REST API:
> https://www.jfrog.com/confluence/display/RTF/Artifactory+REST+API
> This would NOT have a compute abstraction but instead be much in tne same
> vein as the jdbc and etcd providers: API only. We've already started work
> here but before we went too far thought I'd pitch it to the community to see
> if you'd be up for hosting the code and thus adding another provider to the
> jclouds-labs catalog.
> [~nacx] thoughts?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
