> + assertEquals(image.id(), testImageId);
> + assertEquals(image.properties().name(),
> "ubuntu-14.04.3-server-amd64.iso");
> + }
> +
> + @Test
> + public void testList() {
> + List<Image> images = imageApi().getList();
> +
> + assertNotNull(images);
> + assertFalse(images.isEmpty());
> + assertTrue(images.size() > 1);
> + }
> +
> + private ImageApi imageApi() {
> + return api.imageApi();
> + }
That makes sense
Jasmin Gacić
On Feb 29, 2016 13:36, "Reijhanniel Jearl Campos" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> In
> profitbricks-rest/src/test/java/org/apache/jclouds/profitbricks/rest/features/ImageApiLiveTest.java
> <https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/242#discussion_r54403984>:
>
> > + assertEquals(image.id(), testImageId);
> > + assertEquals(image.properties().name(),
> > "ubuntu-14.04.3-server-amd64.iso");
> > + }
> > +
> > + @Test
> > + public void testList() {
> > + List<Image> images = imageApi().getList();
> > +
> > + assertNotNull(images);
> > + assertFalse(images.isEmpty());
> > + assertTrue(images.size() > 1);
> > + }
> > +
> > + private ImageApi imageApi() {
> > + return api.imageApi();
> > + }
>
> He might be pertaining to methods with the DepthOptions param (getList,
> getImage). :)
>
> About the *update* and *delete* operations: Since the PB API doesn't have
> an endpoint to actually upload images (was this via FTP, IIRC?), would it
> make sense if we just remove these operations, and just leave the GET
> requests to keep it simple? This is the case for the soap counterpart
> <https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/blob/master/providers/profitbricks/src/main/java/org/jclouds/profitbricks/features/ImageApi.java#L42>.
> Although I'm not aware as to how many users would actually depend on this
> feature, so... thoughts?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/242/files#r54403984>.
>
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/242/files#r54406011
