> + " \"template\" : " + template + ", " +
> + " \"mode\" : \"" + mode + "\", " +
> + " \"parameters\" : " + parameters + " " +
> + " } " +
> + "}";
> + return body;
> + }
> +
> + @Test(groups = "live")
> + public void testCreate() {
> + Long now = System.currentTimeMillis();
> + resourceName = "jcres" + now;
> + deploymentName = "jcdep" + now;
> + String template =
> "{\"$schema\":\"https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentTemplate.json#\",\"contentVersion\":\"1.0.0.0\",\"parameters\":{\"newStorageAccountName\":{\"type\":\"string\",\"metadata\":{\"description\":\"Name
> of the Storage
> Account\"}},\"storageAccountType\":{\"type\":\"string\",\"defaultValue\":\"Standard_LRS\",\"allowedValues\":[\"Standard_LRS\",\"Standard_GRS\",\"Standard_ZRS\"],\"metadata\":{\"description\":\"Storage
> Account type\"}},\"location\":{\"type\":\"string\",\"allowedValues\":[\"East
> US\",\"West US\",\"West Europe\",\"East Asia\",\"Southeast
> Asia\"],\"metadata\":{\"description\":\"Location of storage
> account\"}}},\"resources\":[{\"type\":\"Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts\",\"name\":\"[parameters('newStorageAccountName')]\",\"apiVersion\":\"2015-05-01-preview\",\"location\":\"[parameters('location')]\",\"properties\":{\"accountType\":\"[parameters('storageAccountType')]\"}}]}";
> + String parameters = "{\"newStorageAccountName\":{\"value\":\"" +
> resourceName +
> "\"},\"storageAccountType\":{\"value\":\"Standard_LRS\"},\"location\":{\"value\":\"West
> US\"}}";
> + String properties = getPutBody(template, "Incremental", parameters);
> I don't think anyone would really use it directly
@nacx Would users ever call the DeploymentApi directly? As @jmspring mentioned,
if users always leverage jclouds templates to provision everything, then the
APIs should reflect the raw APIs. WDYT?
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/273/files/74f8e9bf66e7427298c5c3c9567aa7d8284e0987#r64762789
