pan3793 commented on code in PR #5182:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kyuubi/pull/5182#discussion_r1304545505
##########
kyuubi-server/src/main/scala/org/apache/kyuubi/session/SessionLimiter.scala:
##########
@@ -101,14 +101,21 @@ class SessionLimiterImpl(userLimit: Int, ipAddressLimit:
Int, userIpAddressLimit
}
}
-class SessionLimiterWithUnlimitedUsersImpl(
+class SessionLimiterWithAccessControlListImpl(
userLimit: Int,
ipAddressLimit: Int,
userIpAddressLimit: Int,
- var unlimitedUsers: Set[String])
+ var unlimitedUsers: Set[String],
+ var limitedUsers: Set[String])
extends SessionLimiterImpl(userLimit, ipAddressLimit, userIpAddressLimit) {
override def increment(userIpAddress: UserIpAddress): Unit = {
- if (!unlimitedUsers.contains(userIpAddress.user)) {
+ val user = userIpAddress.user
+ if (StringUtils.isNotBlank(user) && limitedUsers.contains(user)) {
Review Comment:
1. that's why we discuss the priority of `limited.user.list` and
`unlimited.user.list`, I think it's fine that `limited.user.list` takes high
priority. (it means when `limited.user.list` is configured, ignore
`unlimited.user.list`)
2. `user-ipaddress` should be affected by this change too. and we can
introduce a similar change for `ipaddress` in another PR.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]