pan3793 opened a new pull request, #7289:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kyuubi/pull/7289

   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!
   
   Here are some tips for you:
     1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://kyuubi.readthedocs.io/en/master/contributing/code/index.html
     2. If the PR is related to an issue in 
https://github.com/apache/kyuubi/issues, add '[KYUUBI #XXXX]' in your PR title, 
e.g., '[KYUUBI #XXXX] Your PR title ...'.
     3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., 
'[WIP][KYUUBI #XXXX] Your PR title ...'.
   -->
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   <!--
   Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
     1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
     2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug, and what versions 
are affected.
   -->
   
   I hit an issue while preparing 1.11.0 RC0, which indicates I need to use a 
higher version of JDK for releasing.
   
   ```
   [INFO] --- antlr4:4.13.1:antlr4 (default) @ kyuubi-extension-spark-4-0_2.13 
---
   [WARNING] Error injecting: org.antlr.mojo.antlr4.Antlr4Mojo
   java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: org/antlr/v4/Tool has been compiled 
by a more recent version of the Java Runtime (class file version 55.0), this 
version of the Java Runtime only recognizes class file versions up to 52.0
       at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1 (Native Method)
       at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass (ClassLoader.java:756)
       at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass 
(SecureClassLoader.java:142)
   ```
   
   In https://github.com/apache/kyuubi/pull/7144, we made it always use 
`-release:8` for `jdk9+`, so we still produce Java 8 compatible bytecode even 
using JDK 17, for all modules except Spark 4.0/4.1 extension modules.
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some 
test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive 
cases if possible.
   If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify 
how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other 
reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
   If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why 
it was difficult to add.
   -->
   Will verify this in the next RC of 1.11.0
   
   ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
   <!--
   If a generative AI tooling has been used in the process of authoring this 
patch, please include
   phrase 'Generated-by: ' followed by the name of the tool and its version.
   If no, write 'No'.
   Please refer to the [ASF Generative Tooling 
Guidance](https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html) for details.
   -->
   No.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to